Excursion into history
After the technocratic attitude to scientific branches including medicine in the 20th century, when it was the dominance of the human and his triumph over the nature under all circumstances and conditions, science has come to the phase of certain self- reflection. In spite of optimistic prospects and indisputable success in the field of medicine and pharmacology is the turning point of the millennium considered to be the period of disillusion, when the growing part of professional public is more and more loudly and openly interested in the questions of the inability of the adequate substitution of natural substances by synthetic preparations. The example could be the effectiveness of certain medical products on the aimed problem, where the synthetic substances act more aggressively and effectively than natural substances, nevertheless with the burden of negative side- effects on the patient’s health and with symptoms of their negative chain reaction.
A lot of specialists from various spheres of medicine, for example immunology, allergology, neurology, physiatry and others, are nowadays aware of the drawbacks of the unconditional and absolute application of synthetic allophatic medicaments and procedures of classical medicine. But at the same time occur opinions that natural products by themselves in their original natural form – e.g. foodstuff - will not be able to help the human body to deal successfully with the loading and ballast , which have effects on him in the form of pollution, bad eating habits and nourishment composition, stress etc. As the solution to this problem is frequently suggested the action of supply of concentrated natural effective substances into body in the scope reflecting the load of the organism by negative influences.
After the technocratic attitude to scientific branches including medicine in the 20th century, when it was the dominance of the human and his triumph over the nature under all circumstances and conditions, science has come to the phase of certain self- reflection. In spite of optimistic prospects and indisputable success in the field of medicine and pharmacology is the turning point of the millennium considered to be the period of disillusion, when the growing part of professional public is more and more loudly and openly interested in the questions of the inability of the adequate substitution of natural substances by synthetic preparations. The example could be the effectiveness of certain medical products on the aimed problem, where the synthetic substances act more aggressively and effectively than natural substances, nevertheless with the burden of negative side- effects on the patient’s health and with symptoms of their negative chain reaction.
A lot of specialists from various spheres of medicine, for example immunology, allergology, neurology, physiatry and others, are nowadays aware of the drawbacks of the unconditional and absolute application of synthetic allophatic medicaments and procedures of classical medicine. But at the same time occur opinions that natural products by themselves in their original natural form – e.g. foodstuff - will not be able to help the human body to deal successfully with the loading and ballast , which have effects on him in the form of pollution, bad eating habits and nourishment composition, stress etc. As the solution to this problem is frequently suggested the action of supply of concentrated natural effective substances into body in the scope reflecting the load of the organism by negative influences.
